Characterization of the regeneration of the arm of the echinoderm Ophiothrix lineata (Lyman, 1860)

Authors

  • Yomalt Estrella Alarcón-Reyes Laboratorio de Evolución y Embriología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Agro- pecuarias, Universidad Ve- racruzana.
  • Eduardo Zarza-Meza Laboratorio de Evolución y Embriología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Agro- pecuarias, Universidad Veracruzana.
  • Pablo San Martín Del Angel Laboratorio de Evolución y Embriología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Agro- pecuarias, Universidad Veracruzana.
  • Rosa Idalia Hernández-Herrera Laboratorio de Evolución y Embriología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Agro- pecuarias, Universidad Veracruzana.
  • Rodrigo Cuervo Laboratorio de Evolución y Embriología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Agro- pecuarias, Universidad Veracruzana.

Keywords:

Brittlestar, regeneration, blastema, Ophiothrix lineate

Abstract

Body regeneration is a common ability in most protostomate species, opposite to the lack
of such ability in deuterostomates. Regeneration in Echinodermata species is important to
understand regeneration in some exceptional chordate species. Echinodermata species have
a great ability to regenerate anatomical structures from their three germinal layers. In present
study, an arm was cut at its insertion in disc, at the first vertebra in Ophiotrix lineata, which
is a deuterostomate eccinoderm in search for its regeneration ability by recording periodical
stages in such a potential ability, since the very starting of a bud until the whole functional

differentiation. Records were taken every five days during a one-month span. Histological ex-
aminations were performed through the first eight days after amputation. Results demonstrated

a growth of 0.23 mm per day. Regeneration process was observed in four stages as follows:
first, re-epithelization of hurt disc, second, the formation of a regenerative blastema, third,
lengthening and segmentation of blastema, and fourth, cellular differentiation and mechanical
function of regenerated arm. It is remarkable the rapid formation of blastema as well as the
presence of radial nerve at sixth day after amputation.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
No
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
18%
33%
Days to publication 
20
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A

References

Sánchez-Alvarado A. Regeneration in the metazoans:

why does it happen? Bioessays. 2000; 22: 578-590.

Cuervo R, Hernández-Martínez R, Chimal-Monroy J,

Merchant-Larios H, Covarrubias L. Full regeneration

of the tribasal Polypterus fi n. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.

; 109: 3838-3843.

García-Arrarás JE, Domaltov IY. Echinoderms: potential

model systems for studies on muscle regeneration. Curr

Pharm Des. 2010; 16: 942-955.

Sodergren E et al. The genome of the sea urchin Stron-

gylocentrotus purpuratus. Science. 2006; 314: 941-952.

Stöhr S, O’Hara TD, Thuy B. Global Diversity of Brittle

Stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea). PLoS One. 2012;

: e31940.

Candia-Carnevali MD, Thorndyke MC, Matranga V.

Regenerating echinoderms: a promise to understand

stem cells potential. In: Rinkevich B, Matranga V. Stem

cells in Marine Organisms. 2009: pp. 165-184.

Candia-Carnevali MD, Bonasoro F. Introduction to the

biology of regeneration in echinoderms. Microsc Res

Tech. 2001; 55: 365-368.

Candia-Carnevali MD. Regeneration in echinoderms:

repair, regrowth, cloning. Invertebrate Survival Journal.

; 3: 64-76.

Yokoyama LQ, Amaral AC. Arm regeneration in two

populations of Ophionereis reticulata (Echinodermata,

Ophiuroidea). Iheringia, Série Zoologia. 2010; 100: 123-

Candia-Carnevali MD, Bonasoro F, Patruno M, Thorn-

dyke MC. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of arm

regeneration in crinoids echinoderms: the potential of

arm explants. Dev Genes Evol. 1998; 208: 421-430.

Kondo M, Akasaka K. Regeneration in crinoids. Dev

Growth Diff. 2010; 52: 57-68.

Dupont S, Thorndyke MC. Growth or differentiation?

Adaptive regeneration in the brittlestar Amphiura fi lifor-

mis. J Exp Biol. 2006; 209: 3873-3881.

Biressi AC, Zou T, Dupont S, Dahlberg C, Di Benedetto

C, Bonasoro F et al. Wound healing and arm regenera-

tion in Ophioderma longicaudum and Amphiura fi liformis

(Ophiuroidea, Echinodermata): Comparative morpho-

genesis and histogenesis. Zoomorphology. 2010; 129:

-19.

Chinn S. 2006. Habitat distribution and comparison

of brittlestar (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) arm rege-

neration on Moorea, French Polynesia. UCB Moore a

Class: Biology and Geomorphology of Tropical Islands

UC Berkeley. Disponible en: http://www.escholarship.

org/uc/item/9jm2351g

Clark MS, Dupont S, Rossetti H, Burn G, Thorndyke

MC, Peck LS. Delayed arm regeneration in the Antarctic

brittle star (Ophionotus victoriae). Aquatic Biology. 2007;

: 45-53.

Clark MS, Souster T. Slow arm regeneration in the

Antartic brittlestar Ophiura crassa (Echinodermata:

Ophiuroidea). Aquatic Biology. 2012; 16: 105-113.

Candia-Carnevali M, Galassi S, Bonasoro F, Patruno M,

Thorndyke MC. Regenerative response and endocrine

disrupters in crinoid echinoderms: arm regeneration in

Antedon mediterranea after experimental exposure to

Polychlorinated biphenyls. J Exp Biol. 2001; 204: 835-842.

Published

2026-04-08

How to Cite

1.
Alarcón-Reyes YE, Zarza-Meza E, San Martín Del Angel P, Hernández-Herrera RI, Cuervo R. Characterization of the regeneration of the arm of the echinoderm Ophiothrix lineata (Lyman, 1860). Invest. Discapacidad [Internet]. 2026 Apr. 8 [cited 2026 Apr. 8];2(3):103-9. Available from: https://dsm.inr.gob.mx/indiscap/index.php/INDISCAP/article/view/935

Issue

Section

Original articles

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.