Corrections and retractions

Corrections:

  • Rationale: Corrections are issued to rectify errors that affect the accuracy or integrity of published work. These errors may include factual inaccuracies, calculation mistakes, or typographical errors.

  • Initiation: Corrections can be initiated by the authors themselves or identified by the Editorial Office, reviewers, or readers. Authors are encouraged to promptly notify the Editorial Office of any errors detected in their published manuscripts.

  • Assessment: The Editor-in-Chief, in consultation with relevant editorial staff and experts if necessary, evaluates the nature and significance of the error to determine the appropriate course of action.

  • Correction Procedure: Once an error is confirmed, a correction notice is published promptly in the journal, clearly identifying the original article and the nature of the error. The correction notice may include a corrected version of the affected portion of the manuscript if applicable.

  • Dissemination: Corrections are prominently displayed on the journal's website and indexed to ensure visibility and accessibility to readers. Authors of the corrected manuscript are notified of the correction and provided with the updated DOI for their records and citation purposes.

Retractions:

  • Rationale: Retractions are issued in cases of serious errors or misconduct that invalidate the integrity or reliability of published work. Such errors may include data fabrication, plagiarism, ethical violations, or undisclosed conflicts of interest.

  • Initiation: Retractions may be initiated by the authors themselves, upon discovering significant errors or misconduct in their work, or by the Editorial Office, reviewers, or readers who bring concerns to the attention of the Editor-in-Chief.

  • Investigation: Upon receiving allegations of misconduct or serious errors, the Editor-in-Chief initiates a thorough investigation, involving consultation with relevant parties, including authors, institutional authorities, and experts in the field.

  • Decision-Making: Based on the findings of the investigation, the Editor-in-Chief, in consultation with the Editorial Board and legal advisors if necessary, determines whether retraction is warranted. Retractions are considered only in cases of clear evidence of misconduct or irreparable errors that undermine the validity of the published work.

  • Retraction Notice: If retraction is deemed necessary, a retraction notice is issued, clearly stating the reasons for retraction, the nature of the errors or misconduct, and any relevant corrective actions taken. The retraction notice is published prominently in the journal and linked to the original article.

  • Dissemination: Retraction notices are disseminated widely through the journal's website, indexing databases, and relevant academic channels to ensure that readers are informed of the retracted work's status and reasons for retraction.

Ethical Considerations:

  • Confidentiality: All investigations into potential corrections or retractions are conducted with strict confidentiality to protect the privacy and reputation of all parties involved, including authors, reviewers, and whistleblowers.

  • Fair Process: Authors are provided with an opportunity to respond to allegations of errors or misconduct and to present their case during the investigation process. Decisions regarding corrections or retractions are made impartially and transparently, guided by the principles of fairness and due process.

  • Disclosure: Corrections and retractions are accompanied by clear and transparent explanations of the reasons for the action, ensuring accountability and maintaining the journal's credibility and trustworthiness.

By adhering to these policies and ethical standards, Investigación en Discapacidad upholds its commitment to promoting integrity, transparency, and accountability in scholarly publishing, thereby safeguarding the integrity of the scientific record and maintaining public trust in the journal and the research community.