Risk factors associated with central auditory processing disorder

Authors

  • Sergio Díaz Leines Servicio de Procesos Centrales de la Audición. Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación «Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra». Ciudad de México, México.
  • Elva Carolina Esquivel García Servicio de Procesos Centrales de la Audición. Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación «Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra». Ciudad de México, México.
  • Guillermo Buenrostro Márquez Servicio de Procesos Centrales de la Audición. Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación «Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra». Ciudad de México, México.
  • María del Consuelo Martínez-Wbaldo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35366/105478

Keywords:

Central auditory process disorder, perinatal risk factors, socio-family risk factors

Abstract

Introduction: There are neurological, auditory and visual sensory risk factors as well as socio-family risk factors that may be present before pregnancy, during pregnancy, and after the child’s gestation that can produce alterations in their neurodevelopment, however there are few. Reports of these risks associated with central auditory processing disorder (CAPD). The objective of this study was to describe and compare the frequency of these factors in schoolchildren with and without CAPD.

Material and methods: Observational, comparative, non-experimental cross-sectional study that consisted of studying a voluntary sample of mothers of schoolchildren grouped with and without CAPD between March and November 2019, to describe the biological and socio-family risks before, during and after pregnancy. Comparing them in children with and without CAPD, using χ2 of homogeneity (comparison), χ2 of independence (association) and Cohen’s kappa strength of association. After signing informed consent, a structured interview conducted with the parents and a battery of psychoacoustic tests applied to evaluate central auditory processes in the children. Results:group of 44 cases and another of 40 controls were studied, five prenatal, eight perinatal and seven socio-family risk factors were identified. Associated with CAPD, threatened abortion, pre-eclampsia and eclampsia, hyperbilirubinemia, unplanned pregnancy and domestic violence. Conclusions: Even when there is evidence of risk factors associated with CAPD, those identified here be taken into account as a history in schoolchildren with clinical manifestations compatible with this disorder. 

References

Working Group on Auditory Processing Disorders. (Central)

Auditory Processing Disorders. American Speech-

Language-Hearing Association. Available in: http://www.

asha.org/members/deskref-journals/deskref/default

Schow RL, Chermak G. Implications from factor

analysis for central auditory processing disorders. Am

J Audiol. 1999; 8: 137-142. Available in: https://doi.

org/10.1044/1059-0889(1999/012)

DeBonis DA, Moncrieff D. Auditory processing disorders:

an update for speech-language pathologists. Am J

Speech Lang Pathol. 2008; 17: 4-18. doi: 10.1044/1058-

(2008/002).

Musiek FE, Gollegly KM, Lamb LE, Lamb P. Selected

issues in screening for central auditory processing

dysfunction. Semin Hear. 1990; 11: 372-384.

Zenker Castro F, Barajas del Prat JJ. Central auditory

function. Auditio. 2021; 2 (2): 31-34. Available in: https://

doi.org/10.51445/sja.auditio.vol2.2003.0025

Bellis TJ, Ferre JM. Multidimensional approach to the

differential diagnosis of central auditory processing

disorders in children. J Am Acad Audiol. 1999; 10: 319-328.

Bellis TJ, Bellis JD. Central auditory processing disorders

in children and adults. Handb Clin Neurol. 2015; 129:

-556. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-62630-1.00030-5.

Bartlett K, Kelley E, Purdy J, Stein MT. Auditory

processing disorder: what does it mean and what can

be done? J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2017; 38 (5): 349-351.

doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000450.

Micallef LA. Auditory processing disorder (APD):

progress in diagnostics so far. A mini-review on imaging

techniques. J Int Adv Otol. 2015; 11 (3): 257-2561. doi:

5152/iao.2015.1009.

McCormick R, Atcherson SR, Findlen UM, Wakefield

S, Benafield NJ. (Central) auditory processing disorder

grand rounds: multiple cases, multiple causes, multiple

outcomes. Am J Audiol. 2017; 26 (3): 202-225. Available

in: https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJA-16-0074

Mehta Z, Arizona M. The clinical challenge of diagnosing

and managing (central) auditory processing disorders.

[Recuperado en noviembre de 2020] Available

in: https://www.asha.org/documents/2017_con/

Handouts/S##_Mehta_Handout.pdf

Bellis TJ. Assessment and management of central

auditory processing disorders in the educational setting

from science to practice. Canada: Publisher Delmar

Learning; 20011.

Witton C. Childhood auditory processing disorder as a

developmental disorder: the case for a multi-professional

approach to diagnosis and management. Int J Audiol.

; 49 (2): 83-87.

Chermak GD. Deciphering auditory processing disorders

in children. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2002; 35 (4): 733-

doi: 10.1016/s0030-6665(02)00056-7.

Musiek FE, Jane AB. The auditory system: Anatomy,

physiology, and clinical correlates. Plural Publishing,

Ferriero D. Neonatal brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2005;

(19): 1985-1995.

Alarcón Prieto MF, Gallo García DF, Rincón Lozada

CF. Prenatal, perinatal and neonatal risks associated

with soft neurological signs. Rev Cubana Pediatr

[Internet]. 2020; 92 (1). Disponible en: http://scielo.

sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-

&lng=es

Zamarriego J, Arizcun J. Introducción al Simposium

Internacional sobre experiencias y resultados en

Programas de Prevención de la Subnormalidad. Madrid:

Libro de Actas; 1981. pp. 20-41.

Sección de Perinatología de la Asociación Española de

Pediatría. Atención neonatal. Recomendaciones y bases

para una adecuada asistencia. An Esp Pediatr. 1988; 28:

-344.

Grupo de Atención Temprana. Libro Blanco de la

Atención Temprana. Madrid: Ed. Real Patronato de

Prevención y Atención a Personas con Minusvalía.

Documentos 55/2000; 2000.

Bauer CR. Nuevas perspectivas en la evolución de

los recién nacidos de muy bajo peso. En: IV Curso

Internacional de Medicina Perinatal. Pamplona; 1987.

pp. 117-126.

Poo P, Campistol J, Iriondo M. Recién nacido de riesgo

neurológico en el año 2000. Recomendaciones para el

seguimiento, incorporación de nuevos instrumentos. Rev

Neurol. 2000; 31: 645-652.

American Academy of Pediatrics, Joint Committee

on Infant Hearing. Year 2007 position statement:

principles and guidelines for early hearing detection

and intervention programs. Pediatrics. 2007; 120 (4):

-921. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2333.

Joint Committee on Infant Hearing Year 2019 position

statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing

detection and intervention programs. J Early Hear

Detect Interv. 2019; 4 (2): 1-44. Available in: https://doi.

org/10.15142/fptk-b748

Connolly JL, Carron JD, Roark SD. Universal newborn

hearing screening: are we achieving the Joint Committee

on Infant Hearing (JCIH) objectives? Laryngoscope.

; 115 (2): 232-236.

Hartley DE, Hill PR, Moore DR. The auditory basis of

language impairments: temporal processing versus

processing efficiency hypotheses. International Congress

Series. 2003; 1254: 215-223. Available in: https://doi.

org/10.1016/S0531-5131(03)01057-4

Ramos Sánchez I. Detección y diagnóstico precoz de los

trastornos del desarrollo psicomotor. Vox Pediátr. 2007;

(1): 36-43.

Abou Zahr C, Wardlaw TM, Choi Y. Maternal mortality

in 2000: estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF and

UNFPA. Geneva: WHO; 2004.

Roméu BS, Saéz Z, Roméu EM. Factores de

riesgo asociados a trastornos en el aprendizaje

escolar: un problema sociomédico. MediSur.

; 8 (4): 30-39 Disponible en: http://scielo.

sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1727-

X2010000400006&lng=es.

Roksa J, Kinsley P. The role of family support in

facilitating academic success of low-income students.

Res High Educ. 2019; 60 (4): 415-436. Available in:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-9517-z

Bojanini JF, Gómez JG. Resultados obstétricos y

perinatales en adolescentes. Rev Colomb Obstet

Ginecol. 2004; 55 (2): 114-121. Disponible en: http://www.

scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-

&lng=en

Torres I, Aguilar CE, Flores EJ et al. Embarazo en

adolescentes, riesgos obstétricos durante el parto

y puerperio inmediato, en el Hospital Leonardo

Martínez Valenzuela. Rev Esp Cienc Salud. 2015;

(2): 29-34.

Ruiz Restrepo IJ, Castro Medina JR. Desórdenes del

procesamiento auditivo. Iatreia. 2006; 19 (4): 369-

Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, Chu Y, Perin J, Zhu J et al.

Global, regional, and national causes of under-5

mortality in 2000–15: an updated systematic

analysis with implications for the Sustainable

Development Goals. Lancet. 2016; 388 (10063):

-3035. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/

S0140-6736(14)61698-6

Church MW, Kaltenbach JA. Hearing, speech,

language, and vestibular disorders in the fetal alcohol

syndrome: a literature review. Alcohol Clin Exp

Res. 1997; 21 (3): 495-512. Available in: https://doi.

org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.1997.tb03796.x

Núñez-Batalla F, Carro-Fernández P, Antuña-León

ME, González-Trelles T. Incidencia de hipoacusia

secundaria a hiperbilirrubinemia en un programa

de cribado auditivo neonatal universal basado en

otoemisiones acústicas y potenciales evocados

auditivos. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2008; 59 (3):

-113. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/

S0001-6519(08)73276-X

Published

2024-07-10

How to Cite

1.
Díaz Leines S, Esquivel García EC, Buenrostro Márquez G, Martínez-Wbaldo M del C. Risk factors associated with central auditory processing disorder. Invest. Discapacidad [Internet]. 2024 Jul. 10 [cited 2024 Dec. 27];8(2):51-6. Available from: https://dsm.inr.gob.mx/indiscap/index.php/INDISCAP/article/view/74

Issue

Section

Original articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.