Volumetric bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography: reference values for the mexican pediatric population

Authors

  • Elisa Martínez Coria
  • Cinthya Lourdes Toledo Peral
  • Norma Pilar Castellanos Abrego
  • Martín Luna Méndez
  • Josefina Gutiérrez Martínez

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35366/103938

Keywords:

Peak bone mass, quantitative computed tomography, volumetric bone mineral density, Pediatric vBMD, DXA

Abstract

Introduction: Nowadays, childhood diseases as Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) have
raised interest in pediatric bone densitometry, since long-term steroid therapy is a serious risk
factor for osteoporosis. Even though dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the most used
technique to measure bone mineral density (BMD), quantitative computed tomography (QCT)
is the most exact way to assess bone health. But the reference values are available for adult
populations, and only for a few pediatric populations. Objective: The aim of this study is to
measure volumetric BMD (vBMD) values using QCT to determine the reference values of healthy
Mexican pediatric population. Material and methods: This is an observational transversal
study to measure vBMD from three images of healthy trabecular lumbar spine using QCT.
Results: vBMD data has a sigmoid behavior in both genders, with a delayed start for males;
the difference in values during puberty have a moderate significant correlation (-0.546, p=0.004). vBMD values for both genders are 40% lower than the reported for Caucasian pediatric
population. Conclusion: These results encourage us to continue this study to increase the
confidence of the obtained vBMD reference values for Mexican pediatric population. This will
have a high impact in diagnosis accuracy, particularly in chronically ill children, with DMD and
other musculoskeletal diseases.

References

Clarke B. Normal bone anatomy and physiology. Clin J

Am Soc Nephrol. 2008; 3 Suppl 3 (Suppl 3): S131-139.

Bonjour JP, Chevalley T, Ferrari S et al. The importance

and relevance of peak bone mass in the prevalence of

osteoporosis. Salud Publica Mex. 2009; 51 Suppl 1:

S5-17.

Wren TA, Kim PS, Janicka A et al. Timing of peak bone

mass: discrepancies between CT and DXA. J Clin

Endocrinol Metab 1997; 92 (3): 938-941.

Lee DC, Gilsanz V, Wren TA. Limitations of peripheral

quantitative computed tomography metaphyseal bone

density measurements. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;

(11): 4248-4253.

Pérez-López FR, Chedraui P, Cuadros-López JL.

Bone mass gain during puberty and adolescence:

deconstructing gender characteristics. Curr Med Chem.

; 17 (5): 453-466.

Madic D, Obradovic B, Smajic M et al. Status of bone

mineral content and body composition in boys engaged

in intensive physical activity. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2010; 67

(5): 386-390.

Goodfellow LR, Earl S, Cooper C et al. Maternal diet,

behaviour and offspring skeletal health. Int J Environ

Res Public Health. 2010; 7 (4): 1760-1772.

Zerwekh JE. Bone disease and hypercalciuria in

children. Pediatr Nephrol 2010; 25 (3): 395-401.

Buckner JL, Bowden SA, Mahan JD. Optimizing

Bone Health in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Int J

Endocrinol 2015; 2015: 92838.

Lewiecki EM, Binkley N. DXA: 30 years and counting:

Introduction to the 30th anniversary issue. Bone. 2017;

: 1-3.

World Health Organization. Prevention and management

of osteoporosis: report of a WHO scientific group.

WHO. 2003. Available in: http://www.who.int/iris/

handle/10665/42841

Nogueira ML, Lucas R, Ramos I et al. Curvas

osteodensitometricas numa populacao de Mulheres.

Acta Reumatol Port. 2011; 36: 126-136.

Vega E, Bagur A, Mautalen C. Bone mineral density

in osteoporotic and normal woman of Buenos Aires.

Medicina. 1993; 53 (3): 211-216.

Noon E, Singh S, Cuzick J et al. Significances differences

in UK and US female bone density references ranges.

Osteoporos Int. 2010; 21 (11): 1871-1880.

Jáuregui E, Galvis M, Moncaleano V, González K et al.

Valores de referencia de la densidad mineral ósea por

densitometría tipo DXA en una población adulta sana

de Bogotá. Rev colomb Reumatol. 2021; 28 (1): 46-51.

Tamayo J, Díaz R, Lazcano E et al. Reference values

for areal bone mineral density among a health Mexican

population. Salud Public Mex. 2009; 51(Sup1): S56-S83.

Lewiecki EM, Gordon CM, Baim S et al. Special report

on the 2007 adult and pediatric position development

conferences of the international society for clinical

densitometry. Osteoporos Int. 2008; 19 (10): 1369-1378.

Van Rijn RR, Van der Sluis I, Link T et al. Bone

densitometry in children: a critical appraisal. Eur Radiol.

; 13 (4): 700-710.

Lewiecki EM, Watts NB, McClung MR et al. Official

positions of the international society for clinical

densitometry. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004; 89 (8):

-3655.

Brunetto OH. Osteoporosis en Pediatría. Rev Argent

Endocrinol Metab. 2006; 43 (2): 90-108.

Adams JE. Quantitative computed tomography. Eur J

Radiol. 2009; 71 (3): 415-424.

Genant HK, Engelke K, Fuerst T et al. Noninvasive

assessment of bone mineral and structure: state of the

art. J Bone Miner Res. 1996; 11 (6): 707-730.

Kalkwarf HJ, Zemel BS, Gilsanz V et al. The bone

mineral density in chilhood study: bone mineral content

and density according to age, sex and race. J Clin

Endocrinol Metab. 2007; 92 (6): 2087-2099.

Suárez Z. Densidad mineral ósea en niños sanos de 7

a 10 años referidos de la red ambulatoria del Municipio

Iribarren a la unidad de densitometría del servicio

de diagnóstico por imágenes. [Thesis]. “Dr Theóscar

Sanoja”, del Hospital Central Universitario “Dr Antonio

María Pineda”. Universidad Centroccidental “Lisandro

Alvarado”; 2008.

Torres-Mejía G, Guzmán-Pineda R, Téllez-Rojo M et al.

Peak bone mass and bone mineral density correlates for

to 24 year-old Mexican women, using corrected BMD.

Salud Public Mex. 2009; 51 (Supp1): S84-S92.

Gilsanz V, Pérez F, Campbell P et al. Quantitative CT

reference values for vertebral trabecular bone density

in children and Young adults. Radiology 2009; 250 (1):

-227.

Gilzanz V, Gibbens DT, Roe TF et al. Vertebral Bone

Density in Children: Effect of Puberty. Radiology 1988;

(3): 847-850.

Secretaría de Salud. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM229-SSA1-2002, salud ambiental. Requisitos técnicos

para las instalaciones, responsabilidades sanitarias,

especificaciones técnicas para los equipos y protección

radiológica en establecimientos de diagnóstico médico

con rayos X. Diario Oficial. 2006. Disponible en: http://

www.cenetec.salud.gob.mx/descargas/equipoMedico/

normas/NOM_229_SSA1_2002.pdf

Damilakis J, Gulielmi G. Quality assurance and

dosimetry in bone densitometry. Radiol Clin North Am.

; 48 (3): 629-640.

Huda W, Ogden, KM, Khorasani MR. Converting doselength product to effective dose at CT. Radiology. 2008;

(3): 995-1003.

Wayne WD. Bioestadística: base para el análisis delas

ciencias de la salud. 1.ª ed. México: LIMUSA; 2008.

Boot AM, de Ridder MA, Pols HA et al. Bone Mineral

Density in children and adolescents: relation to puberty,

calcium intake, and physical activity. J Clin Endocrinol

Metab. 1997; 82 (1): 57-62.

Neu CM, Manz F, Rauch F et al. Bone Densities and

Bone size at the Distal Radius in healthy children and

adolescents: a study using peripheral quantitative

computed tomography. Bone. 2001; 28 (2): 227-232.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-27

How to Cite

1.
Martínez Coria E, Toledo Peral CL, Castellanos Abrego NP, Luna Méndez M, Gutiérrez Martínez J. Volumetric bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography: reference values for the mexican pediatric population. InDiscap [Internet]. 2024 Jun. 27 [cited 2024 Oct. 5];8(1):8-15. Available from: http://dsm.inr.gob.mx/indiscap/index.php/INDISCAP/article/view/65

Issue

Section

Original articles

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.